Phone: 0118 969 0839

Latest Updates

**From January 21st - London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Personal Searches are currently experiencing delays** Delays with Copeland Personal Searches** Carmarthenshire Council Personal Local Searches are currently delayed around 30 working days **South Somerset Offical Local Searches are currently delayed by 30-35 days but our Personal Local Searches are only taking 2 working days**

Get in touch...

If you would like to ask us anything please use this form and we'll be in touch as quickly as we can.

Your Name
Your Email
Subject
Your Message
I understand Conveyancing Data Services will be making contact by email for the purpose of my enquiry
I understand my personal data will be stored in line with this Privacy Policy
Please email me a copy of this message to my own address
I am happy to receive the latest news and promotions by email

Find out more...

If you are interested in learning more, please click the register button below.

Blog

Richard's April Reflections

24 Apr 2018   |   Sophie Roberts   |   0 Comments

In a complete break from tradition I think I’ll actually waffle on about something relevant to council TATs this month. Sorry about that, but this has been brought on by the government’s response to the call for evidence published last week.

One of the key aims is to reduce council TATs to 10 days across the board and eliminate restrictions for search agent access (we currently face all sorts of obstacles such as booking systems, limitations on the amount of searches you can conduct in one visit etc.). Fantastic we all say and I’m pleased to report that the averages across all the councils are currently well below the government’s target for both Official searches and Personal searches. However about 25% of councils are currently above the proposed target, so there is a lot of work to be done in some areas.

Whilst I’m on this subject I might as well comment on some of the other points raised in the response as well (not all of them, I promise) and must add that this is my personal view and doesn’t necessarily reflect the view of my company and/or my colleagues, so please feel free to shout if you disagree with me at all! :)

I know quite a few Estate Agents (some of which receive this monthly missive) and I don’t think there is a single one of them who would argue against further agent regulation. It might be a bit more hassle, but it also provides a barrier to entry into the market that previously didn’t exist. So that receives a tick in my book.

Referral fee transparency is also something that was clearly telegraphed prior to the publication so is no surprise. However the whole argument over referral fees is still up for debate. Again my view, but aren’t referral fees just a “cost of sale”, in exactly the same way that employing a salesperson is a “cost of sale” or taking a client to a football match is a “cost of sale”? Therefore you should simply just build the fees into your overhead. Where we get into dangerous territory is when the referral fee is paid and the cost you can charge is also mandated. That removes the ability to manage your business. But there is always a choice.

I applaud the intention to educate the consumer better in how to choose a conveyancer, but struggle to see how they will do this. All the focus is on price right now (I hear www.easyConveyance.com has launched as a price comparison site) so there is a great deal of work to be done here and I think the challenge has been thrown out to the profession here.

Making better use of technology is a no-brainer in my view and probably something that would happen anyway. Government plan to establish a working group to look at things like digital signatures, ID verification and e-conveyancing. Solutions to most of these already exist, but to speed up their adoption the working group needs to set out standardised protocols etc. then everyone builds variations of the same thing that can all talk to each other.

Likewise the provision of more information up front. I, like many of you, went through HIPs so I tend to agree with the concept. A property passport in the long term (electronic?) probably makes sense and I must admit I have a folder at home that contains all our planning permissions, certificates and searches, so I could be ‘sale ready’ at the drop of a hat.

Also it’s good to see the leasehold issues highlighted. Fingers crossed that fixed time frames and maximum fees are adhered to.

And Decision in Principle certificates from lenders do make sense and make sure people know how much they can afford from the outset. A good thing indeed! Finally the Reservation Agreement might work, but it’s a bit wishy-washy at the moment, lots of work needed here.

Anyway, here are the councils that should be nervously looking over their shoulder to avoid the Whitehall/Westminster spotlight:

OLAS (Official) TAT PLAS (Personal) TAT
North Wiltshire District Council 42 Havant Borough Council 26
Copeland Borough Council 23 West Dorset District Council 26
Hackney London Borough Council 22 Neath Porth Talbot County Borough Council 25
Bridgend County Borough Council (Residential) 21 Harrogate Borough Council 22
Pembrokeshire County Council 21 Broxtowe Borough Council 21
Eastleigh Borough Council 20 Torbay Borough Council 21
Lewes District Council 20 Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council 20
Stockport Borough Council 20 Craven District Council 20
Derby City Council/Res 19 East Cambridgeshire District Council 20
North Tyneside Borough Council/Res 19 Mendip District Council 20
West Wiltshire DC 19 Boston Borough Council 19
Blaby District Council/Res 18 Hackney London Borough Council 19
Dudley Met Borough Council 18 Harlow District Council 19
Greenwich London Borough Council 18 Hartlepool Borough Council 19
High Peak Bor Cnc/Res 18 Lewes District Council 19
Rochdale Borough Council 18 North East Derbyshire District Council 19
Stratford-Upon-Avon Dist Ccl/Res 18 Test Valley Borough Council 19
East Staffordshire Bor Cncl/Res 17 Bolsover District Council 18
East Lindsey District Council 16 Portsmouth City Council 18

 

Overall though the average TATs have reduced again in March and I really hope to be able to report that average turnaround times are now in the 7 working days band in the coming months.

 

However the sun is out, spring has sprung and that always leads to an organic increase in volume as people actually get out there house hunting. 
You can after all only do so much on Rightmove/Zoopla! Actually that would be an interesting stat. 
I wonder what the % is of people buying houses purely from their online description is?
Even the ‘professional’ landlords I know always insist on a visit (even if it isn’t by themselves).

 

Have a lovely spring……………………..now it’s here.

 

Cheers

Richard

0 Comments

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields marked *

I understand my personal data will be stored in line with this Privacy Policy
I understand my Name will be displayed with my post
I am happy to receive the latest news and promotions by email
Sign Up to Our Newsletter
Your Name
Your Email
x

Cookies: By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. You can change this and find out more by following this link

<<
Property Searches Login
Username
Title Insurance
x

Registration Form

Your password will be sent to the above email address.

I understand Conveyancing Data Services will be making contact by email/phone about my registration *

I understand my business data will be stored in line with this Privacy Policy *

Accept Terms and Conditions *

I am happy to receive the latest news and promotions by email

* Required field